<< 'Jai Ho' for Congress in poll campaign | Twelve egg whites and half a kilo chicken a day for Saif >>

Kylie and Sly don't cost much

by News Feed 3. March 2009 15:57

Kylie Minogue is cheaper than Kareena and Sylvester Stalone is a bargain compared to Akshay Kumar. Insiders in Bollywood say foreign stars charge much less than their Indian counterparts for roles in Bollywood.

Read the full story at: http://in.news.yahoo.com/32/20090303/1070/ten-kylie-and-sly-don-t-cost-much.html

Be the first to rate this post

Currently 0/5 Stars.
1
2
3
4
5

Tags: kylie, sly, dont, cost, much

Bollywood

Behind Bollywood's grease paint, the untold story (This is the fourth in a series by IANS on Bollywood's behind-the-scenes people)New Delhi, April 11 (IANS) He is 80 years old and has spent over 60 years giving make-up to the bigg...Dancing to luck in Bollywood: the choreographers (This is the fifth in a series by IANS on Bollywood's behind-the-scenes people)New Delhi, April 27 (IANS) What would Bollywood be without their pulsating moves! But dance director...Lyricists on song: Bollywood's unsung wordsmiths (First of a series by IANS on Bollywood's behind-the-scenes people)Mumbai, March 23 (IANS) 'Mera gora ang lai le', 'Aap ki aankhon mein', 'Dil toh ...


	News	Bollywood	Music	Videos	Sport	Photos

Kylie and Sly don't cost much

Related posts

TextBox

RecentPosts

Kylie and Sly don&#39;t cost much

Related posts

TextBox

Tag cloud

RecentPosts

Kylie and Sly don't cost much